A thing that has struck me from time to time is the surprising number of things that come in varieties labelled as ‘1’ and ‘3’, or ‘1st’ and ‘3rd’, missing out 2.
I tend to think of this as ‘Trinity Boat Club Syndrome’, since my standard example case is the 1st and 3rd Trinity Boat Club. (I've always faintly wondered what happened to the 2nd, and had rather hoped it would have been disbanded in mysterious circumstances after the inadequately explained sinking of a John's boat, or possibly an Oxford one; I was recently disappointed to find out that their website actually answers the question and it's nothing so exciting.)
There are several other common ones. You hear a lot about the Third World and the First World, but ‘Second World’ is not a widely used phrase by comparison. Fiction tends to appear in single novels or trilogies, with relatively few two-
More domain-
So: what other examples of this haven't I thought of, and what can we do to rehabilitate the poor left-
Then again, if I can't apply that argument to Choose Your Own Adventure, perhaps I shouldn't be applying it to computerised text adventures either. Hmmm. I think the underlying point here is that for a book to be in the first or third person is a grammatical statement, meaning that the protagonist is referred to respectively as "I" or "he/she/etc", but for a video game to be in the first or third person is a statement about viewpoint, meaning that the player sees respectively what the protagonist sees or what an uninvolved observer near the protagonist would see. So text adventures are second-person in the grammatical sense, but first-person in the viewpoint sense, and hence my confusion.
I assumed it was in the imperative? I can't offhand think of any verb but "be", but I think I'd write "be cautious" not "am cautious" to the prompt.
I think in fact the normal setup is more infinitive than imperative: the computer says "You are in a room etc", and then implicitly (by presenting the prompt) asks "What do you do?". To the question phrased like that, I think, "be cautious" would be more natural than "I am cautious".
> VENE
> VIDE
Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres.
> VICE