Trinity Boat Club Syndrome
A thing that has struck me from time to time is the surprising number of things that come in varieties labelled as ‘1’ and ‘3’, or ‘1st’ and ‘3rd’, missing out 2.
I tend to think of this as ‘Trinity Boat Club Syndrome’, since my standard example case is the 1st and 3rd Trinity Boat Club. (I've always faintly wondered what happened to the 2nd, and had rather hoped it would have been disbanded in mysterious circumstances after the inadequately explained sinking of a John's boat, or possibly an Oxford one; I was recently disappointed to find out that their website actually answers the question and it's nothing so exciting.)
There are several other common ones. You hear a lot about the Third World and the First World, but ‘Second World’ is not a widely used phrase by comparison. Fiction tends to appear in single novels or trilogies, with relatively few two-
More domain-
So: what other examples of this haven't I thought of, and what can we do to rehabilitate the poor left-
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Then again, if I can't apply that argument to Choose Your Own Adventure, perhaps I shouldn't be applying it to computerised text adventures either. Hmmm. I think the underlying point here is that for a book to be in the first or third person is a grammatical statement, meaning that the protagonist is referred to respectively as "I" or "he/she/etc", but for a video game to be in the first or third person is a statement about viewpoint, meaning that the player sees respectively what the protagonist sees or what an uninvolved observer near the protagonist would see. So text adventures are second-person in the grammatical sense, but first-person in the viewpoint sense, and hence my confusion.
no subject
I assumed it was in the imperative? I can't offhand think of any verb but "be", but I think I'd write "be cautious" not "am cautious" to the prompt.
no subject
I think in fact the normal setup is more infinitive than imperative: the computer says "You are in a room etc", and then implicitly (by presenting the prompt) asks "What do you do?". To the question phrased like that, I think, "be cautious" would be more natural than "I am cautious".
no subject
> VENE
> VIDE
Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres.
> VICE
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-06-17 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Godwin's Law
no subject
Yes, I've a long rant about how "first and third" got its name, but it's not very interesting. (I am moderately impressed that this, and other tidbits of history, and reported accurately on college websites, although I'm surprised that they HAVE been accurate.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(It also suggests – a thought that's occurred to me before on this subject – that there might be quite a few more examples arising from second-system effect, in which only in the third version of a thing do the designers recover from the hubris they acquired from successfully shipping the first.)
no subject
God? Three and one at the same time, without being two.*
I rather like the idea that the "first and third" part of the boat club's name is there as a neat illustration of the "Trinity" part of the name...
* Unless, possibly, you're John Milton.
no subject
Nice one, though. (But I reckon I can come up with a good excuse for having overlooked it ;-)
no subject
Finnish beer bottles have a I or a III (or occasionally an A) on them, indicating their strength. I've never seen a II and Wikipedia confirms that it's never used in practice.
no subject