The killer app [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Tue 2007-02-13 10:03
The killer app

Occasionally I invent an imaginary gadget which would solve a particular problem, and then I wish I had that gadget.

People have probably heard me talk before about the stasis fridge (time stops inside it, so it doesn't even have to be cold to stop your food going off, and also you can keep hot food in it and it'll still be hot the next day), and the force-field saucepan (generated from the handle, like a lightsaber – you don't have to wash it up, you just hold it over the bin and turn it off).

But one thing I notice is that when I invent these things, other people always seem to come up with the real killer applications for them. For example, when I described the stasis fridge to [livejournal.com profile] drswirly, his reaction was ‘Aha, and when you go on holiday for a week you can put the dog in it’, which clearly outdid any of my own ideas.

Just now in the office, a colleague has been playing with his new gadget, a ‘digital photo frame’. He mentioned this yesterday, and so last night I was idly wondering what one of those might be. My best idea was that it should be a static display: able to retain the same image indefinitely with no power consumption, and only requiring power to change the picture. Then you could plug it into your computer and download a picture of (say) your girlfriend to it; unplug it and stick it on your bedside table miles away from any computer; and when she leaves you six months later, just download a picture of something else instead. An end-to-end digital photography solution, without resorting to outmoded paper technology at any point.

The actual photo frame in question isn't a static display, as it turns out; it's just a small and gadgetty monitor. The static idea sounded like a more interesting gadget to me – but it took another colleague to point out the ‘real’ killer app, which is that it allows you to have multiple girlfriends who don't know about each other, and change all the photos round every day so that whichever one is visiting that night doesn't suspect! And I have a nasty feeling that that would indeed be the most profitable market for the thing…

LinkReply
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 10:12
Digital photoframes are just a way to make yet another simple object cost a hundred quid and require a wall wart.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontTue 2007-02-13 10:14
That would be precisely the point of making it static: it wouldn't require a wall wart, at least most of the time. (And ideally it should draw power from USB when changing the image, so that it wouldn't require one then either.)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 10:17
Yes, OK, that'd be cool.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] azekeil.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 10:20
Sony already produce an eBook which works in this manner. It's monochrome only, but it only draws power to change the image. They use it as a book displaying device (http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=PRS500U2).
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 10:30
There are liquid crystals that retain their orientation when the power is removed (bistable, ferroelectric - not the common twisted nematic), and you could make a colour display. We did some early prototypes back at GEC in 1990-91, and the technology have improved dramatically since then.

I think ferroelectric LCDs didn't take off, because power gives you more flexibility (illumination and dynamic display) and it is fairly cheap.

Your (say) girlfriend would only be a reflective display, and she might need to be refreshed every few months. I hate to think what sort of metaphor that is for the relationship...
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 11:06
which is that it allows you to have multiple girlfriends who don't know about each other, and change all the photos round every day so that whichever one is visiting that night doesn't suspect! And I have a nasty feeling that that would indeed be the most profitable market for the thing…

In what way can't you (that's a generic, and rather unscrupulous 'you') do this with a regular picture frame?
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontTue 2007-02-13 11:17
The colleague suggested in particular that the updating might be done automatically...
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
(Anonymous)Tue 2007-02-13 11:22
But what if the girlfriends visit unexpectedly? Clearly the solution is to get all your romantic partners RFID-tagged.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 14:11
But then you need to tag them. You should have a webcam so it can seemlessly display a picture of anyone who enters, though you may prefer to make it do so only after the n'th visit, or similar :)
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 11:23
I like the dog idea!

His digital picture frame sort of makes sense. Well, if it's cheaper than a flatscreen monitor... I mean, it's not technically satisfying (yours is much better), because it's overkill, but like ipod or wii it just does what you want without faff.

And I have a nasty feeling that that would indeed be the most profitable market for the thing…

You can tell valentines day is coming up :) But I have to say, wow, you seem to have invented a mirror! :)
Link Reply to this | Thread
[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 12:06
IIRC Niven hints at the dog storage idea - there's a reference to a slaver stasis box having a small animal inside.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 12:09
I'm wondering whether the stasis-fridge would be a good or bad thing for childhood. People would put their babies in the stasis-fridge when they wanted a good night's sleep, so parents of babies everywhere would be happier and saner and more capable, but the babies would be babies for twice as long because they'd be in stasis for half their lives. Indeed, particularly stupid people would leave them in there for even longer, and a whole generation of the people we call chavs would take ten years to go from baby to toddler.

Then of course when they get to the toddler stage, people would put them in the fridge when they had a tantrum and take them out again when they felt like a hug, but the child would still be screaming and angry so would go straight back in. Said stupid people wouldn't understand why their children were always screaming, would decide even more than before that the child was just out to make their lives miserable, and child abuse cases among the stupid would increase massively. (Or, would be carried out by means of violence, rather than by means of turkey twizzlers.) Maybe nobody would ever grow above the age of two, except in places where people can't afford stasis-fridges. Then the adults in first world countries would die, electricity generation would stop, and these toddlers in the fridges would all come back to life and start getting out of the fridges. Meanwhile, people from third world countries would hear all these toddlers screaming as they sailed past in their boats and go and rescue these children.

World population would be dramatically reduced and carbon dioxide output would be decimated. I think we should invent this right now. Except that a substantial portion of the toddlers would subsequently undergo genital mutilation at the hands of their new adoptive parents, so maybe we shouldn't.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontTue 2007-02-13 12:15
Also, the people who put their baby in the stasis fridge overnight would be letting themselves in for what must surely be an even worse torture: a jet-lagged baby. Hardly bears thinking about.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 12:29
But to be awake at night such that somebody wants to put it in a stasis fridge, it must already not have a circadian rhythm to disrupt.

!!!but I just realised - if babies don't have night-time because they're in the fridge, then they won't develop circadian rhythms at all. EVERYBODY WILL BE LIKE ME IN THE FUTURE. Yahahaaaaa.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[personal profile] rmc28Tue 2007-02-13 12:23
It seems like a suboptimal way to achieve a good night's sleep compared with what I currently do - bringing the baby into bed and feeding him when he's hungry in the night. As a nursing mother, I really don't want the baby missing time, as it would play havoc with my body too.

I could shut him in a room the other side of the house too when he cries, but I don't do that, and nor do most parents.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 12:32
Oh yeah, I hadn't thought of that. So there are two ways of managing it:
1) Don't put your baby in the stasis fridge, and breastfeed if possible
2) Use a stasis fridge and feed nothing but formula after the first six weeks
This is turning into a pretty crap future...
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] angoel.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 13:21
3) Breast-pump and put that into the stasis fridge too.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 14:18
4) Climb into fridge yourself. Get accomplice to defrost you when offspring has reached majority.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] atreic.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 14:36
Status fridge bra. Of course.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 16:17
Alternatively, be defrosted when unsupervised offspring burns down house...
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 16:19
Bah! Luddite!
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 15:49
Oh yeah, cunning plan. And it wouldn't even need warming up too, if you put it in quick...
Link Reply to this | Parent
[personal profile] gerald_duckTue 2007-02-13 16:12
A stasis fridge would be handy if you ran out of lemon-soaked paper napkins, too…
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 16:16
*reads it*
*reads it again*
*reads it a third time*
What??
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.comTue 2007-02-13 19:40
But Simon, the boffins have already invented toothpaste that controls time (http://www.colgate.co.uk/app/PDP/ColgateTimeControl/UK/HomePage.cvsp)! Imagine the possibilities! :P
Link Reply to this
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]