*giggle* [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Thu 2006-07-20 08:38
*giggle*
LinkReply
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comThu 2006-07-20 08:06
Natural organic healthcare? Are they making any specific medical claims?
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-07-20 08:10
You are kidding, right? They were offering me the chance to make £2000–£5000 a month if I was honest and ethical, on a tiny business card. There wasn't room for any specific medical claims :-)

(And no URL with further information, either. Just a phone number.)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comThu 2006-07-20 08:12
OK, I'll press the mute button on my quackometer.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-07-20 08:16
*grin*

It certainly seems pretty unlikely to me that they have a genuinely useful product of any kind. However, it doesn't follow that they're quacks: it seems at least as likely that they don't have a product at all and the "healthcare business" is a front for some sort of pyramid scam, which would make them common-or-garden frauds before even getting as far as the medical quackery...
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comThu 2006-07-20 08:19
I realise this - but I'm exercised by medical fraud whereas financial fraud leaves me cold.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-07-20 08:26
Fair enough. Well, if you want me to give you the phone number off the card this evening so you can ask them difficult questions and sic medical watchdogs[1] on them, just say the word :-)

[1] that initially came out as "watchdocs", which was pleasantly apposite.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.comThu 2006-07-20 08:30
Sadly, it's not that easy. If they were advertising on the card, then the ASA would take an interest. Information given down a phone isn't covered by the ASA, so it'd have to be trading standards, where all the burden is on the complainant to prove that it's impossible that the remedy being offered works. It's not enough to say that the suppliers have no evidence that it does work. So all they need to do is use a slight variant on any quackery and I'd have to fund a complete medical trial to get them to stop.
Link Reply to this | Parent
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]