Thought for the day [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Tue 2006-01-31 17:23
Thought for the day

When people change things in their lives – jobs, houses, marital status, whatever – it is often customary to send cards saying things like ‘congratulations’ or ‘good luck in your new job’.

It randomly occurred to me this afternoon that nobody ever sends cards like this when things are staying the same. How about sending a ‘good luck staying in your current job’ card to an employee of a company whose stocks have just plummeted? Or ‘congratulations on staying in your current job’ a month or two later, after the mass redundancies have finished? ‘Good luck in your old home’ if it's slowly falling apart or local property prices are falling? ‘Well done for still having all your limbs intact’, sent at irregular intervals to someone who does particularly extreme sports? Lack of change is sometimes just as much of a risk or an achievement as change, and can perfectly well merit celebration.

I suppose you could see birthday cards as congratulating the recipient on still being alive, and wedding anniversary cards likewise on still being married; but I think those lack ambition. There must be a fortune to be made in non-event greetings cards if you're willing to push the cynicism just a bit further :-)

LinkReply
[identity profile] xaosenkosmos.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:26
There's the potential for a whole line of e-cards here. We should put together a business proposal and see if the bubble is really back or not =)
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:29
I think that's because people don't really mean "good luck in your new house", they mean "Ooh, you have a new house, I'd like to come and see it when you've unpacked because I am curious, and if you were to ask for some help decorating I might say yes".
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:41
Or even "congratulations on keeping a job and relationship you enjoy at the same level; there's nothing you can improve" :)

I guess, it's that it's awkward to do something without an excuse. And harder to remember, too :) That is, if there's no defined time to do so, it seems a bit pushy to send a message. Though a casual mention in a longer conversation or missive would work.

For "good luck with your house", I guess it's that people don't send so many cards, so a dodgy is house is overshadowed by someone else's new house. Or that it's too awkward to send a maybe card: saying "sorry, we're thinking of you" works, as does "Yay!" or "good luck about something specific", but "Remember, what you do is likely to delimb you" is awkwarder.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[identity profile] dennyd.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:45
Or even "congratulations on keeping a job and relationship you enjoy at the same level; there's nothing you can improve" :)

Beat me to it. If you're happy with your life and feel no need to make changes, why should you stop getting congratulated for it? Cards for everyone!!
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:47
Eevryone? Hmmm. Most people I know are striving to change something. I wonder how many would say "No, I'm fine" every day?

But yes, about *most* things, I'm happy. These are generally brought up on annual thingies.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 17:48
Somehow, I really do feel a need to send that special someone a card:

CONGRATULATIONS ON NOT DROPPING DEAD

Link Reply to this
[personal profile] rmc28Tue 2006-01-31 18:27
One of the reasons I still like to remember other people's birthdays (and my own) is precisely that which you say - a day to say "Hurrah! You're here and you're not dead yet!" Ditto anniversaries.
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] hilarita.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 18:29
As for anniversaries, there is a point where the market stops. They don't make cards for 70th wedding anniversaries. They assume that you're dead by then.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[identity profile] teleute.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 20:41
my great grandparents made it to their 65th. And from what I understand they never really got along...
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] jalbobble.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 19:04
Hmm, well the obvious response is that people want others to not think that they're near failing (staying in old job, old house falling apart etc.) but don't mind if it's a hard or failure-provoking thing that they have made the decision to do.
Birthday cards etc. are not saying 'yay! you're not dead!' but more 'we are aware that you have reached some sort of a milestone and are thinking of you'.
There are several flaws in the argument, but that's just the weirdness of human nature (like why a person prefers that everyone pretended they didn't see them fall over, rather than going over to help them).
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] christhomas123.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 19:36
Don't you think sending a card "Well done for not dropping dead yet" is tempting fate just a little?! ;o)
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] teleute.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 20:43
There must be a fortune to be made in non-event greetings cards if you're willing to push the cynicism just a bit further

It was effectivly this attitude that meant Adrian and I didn't do anything to celebrate dating for one month, despite the fact that all my friends at the time were doing so. His responce when I suggested it was an aghast "you didn't expect us to make it this far?" which was an aspect I'd never particularly considered - that celebrating events is actually fairly cynical ;-)
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 21:31
I suspect this doesn't happen for the same reason you'd come round specifically to punch me if I sent you a card congratulating you on still being single...
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] vorno.livejournal.comTue 2006-01-31 23:13
I guess it's just that 'right writes white'.
Link Reply to this
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]