I've had the same problem with shirts and so on in the past. I suppose it makes sense if you think about how buttons are attached by a sewing machine, as opposed to how they're attached by hand; sewing machines can't go round and round the solid bits of the button in the same way hand-sewing can, so I suppose it's no wonder that when one thread gives the whole lot unravels rather more quickly.
Thing is, I'd accept that excuse if the coat had cost me fifteen quid. But when they're charging several hundred for a really nice coat, you'd think they could afford to employ one barely competent monkey to make sure the wretched buttons are competently fastened. I mean, I can sew buttons better than that, and I'm the sort of person who has to concentrate hard to avoid accidentally sewing his thumb to things.
When we got new school shirts, my mum used to take all the buttons off and sew them back on by hand. She reckoned it was a more efficient way to do it than letting us lose the buttons when they inevitably fell off, having to go and buy replacement buttons, and sewing them back on one at a time over a period of a few weeks/months.
Anyway. They could afford to pay one barely competent monkey to sew the buttons on to your coat -- well, it would probably be a small brown child rather than a monkey, but they'd probably still pay them peanuts. Which would at least mean that they had something to eat. The problem is, Mr Coat-Manufacturer wouldn't make such a huge profit if he started paying people when he could get away with using machines. And machines don't do awkward things like demanding time to eat, or sleep. Aren't machines great? Hurrah for the industrial revolution.
Thing is, I'd accept that excuse if the coat had cost me fifteen quid. But when they're charging several hundred for a really nice coat, you'd think they could afford to employ one barely competent monkey to make sure the wretched buttons are competently fastened. I mean, I can sew buttons better than that, and I'm the sort of person who has to concentrate hard to avoid accidentally sewing his thumb to things.
Anyway. They could afford to pay one barely competent monkey to sew the buttons on to your coat -- well, it would probably be a small brown child rather than a monkey, but they'd probably still pay them peanuts. Which would at least mean that they had something to eat. The problem is, Mr Coat-Manufacturer wouldn't make such a huge profit if he started paying people when he could get away with using machines. And machines don't do awkward things like demanding time to eat, or sleep. Aren't machines great? Hurrah for the industrial revolution.