A thought [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Sun 2010-10-17 23:42
A thought

If these things must exist on the Internet, let's at least have their idiosyncratic grammar be justified.

LinkReply
[identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.comSun 2010-10-17 22:45
Im in ur graph
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] marnanel.livejournal.comSun 2010-10-17 22:47
Image
Monotheism
Ay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ay) has it
Link Reply to this | Thread
[identity profile] megamole.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 07:42
Aten-shun!
Link Reply to this | Parent
[personal profile] simontMon 2010-10-18 17:46
More lolcats (and other lolfoos) should include links to Wikipedia.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] meihua.livejournal.comSun 2010-10-17 22:51
... that took me a while.
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comSun 2010-10-17 23:07
It justifies the grammar AND capitalization, no less. But I still doubt it would make grammarians less inclined to hurt one :)
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontMon 2010-10-18 08:29
Does it justify the capitalisation? In my mind's eye, nearly all lolcats are in all-caps. Of course i had to be lower-case in mine, so I decided it would be better to lowercase the whole lot than to muck about with small caps or put up with the rest of the text being larger than the i; but I was definitely under the impression that I was going against the normal capitalisation convention rather than with it.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 13:56
I admit I didn't really think it through. I associated LOLcats with an _absence_ of capitalization, but hadn't really thought about whether that was all-caps or no-caps. I would have guessed no-caps because it's possibly cuter, but also, many image captions are all-caps or no-caps for style reasons, without it being specifically a grammatical choice.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[personal profile] simontMon 2010-10-18 14:06
Well, this is clearly the sort of question that needs SCIENCE. Out of the top three screenfuls of Google Image hits for "lolcat" (which was all I managed before deciding I couldn't be bothered collecting any more data), discarding things that are Demotivators-style posters or otherwise not typical image macro work, I count 29 all-caps lolcats, 30 mixed-case and 22 all-lowercase. That seems pretty well balanced, actually. I take back my assertion :-)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 14:22
Cool :) I did pretty much the same, except that I stopped after 0 pages. Unfortunately, I was quite happy to believe whatever you said, as long as I didn't have to look at any lolcats :)
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] antifuchs.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 01:00
This made me giggle, thanks (-:
Link Reply to this
[personal profile] emperorMon 2010-10-18 07:05
:-)
Link Reply to this
[personal profile] deborah_cMon 2010-10-18 07:13
I laughed. Alistair still has his head in his hands :-)
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] megamole.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 07:41
SLAP
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] sunflowerinrain.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 11:02
ow. ow ow. :)
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] bjh21.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 16:28
Have you got that in vector format so I can stick it to my filing cabinet?
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontMon 2010-10-18 16:46
Its source form is a (pretty grubby and hastily hacked) handwritten piece of PostScript, which depends on the "LMRoman12-Regular" and "LMRoman12-Italic" fonts from the lmodern Debian package. Munging that into a form that can be sent to a PS printer without confusing it is left as an exercise for the reader :-)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] bjh21.livejournal.comMon 2010-10-18 17:33
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~bjh21/lolmaths.pdf

(by just changing your -sDEVICE=pnggray to -sDEVICE=pdfwrite)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[personal profile] simontMon 2010-10-18 17:42
Oh good, that actually does work. The last time I tried to use GS in vector-to-vector filter mode, I found it had produced an output file in which the fonts superficially looked right but were in fact rasterisations of the originals, which annoyed me.

Mind you, I think that was using pswrite rather than pdfwrite. Perhaps I was hasty in concluding that it would apply to both.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] pne.livejournal.comWed 2010-10-20 13:22
I like it!

Mind if post the image and/or a link to this entry to [livejournal.com profile] math_jokes?
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontWed 2010-10-20 13:25
Feel free. Thank you :-)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] pne.livejournal.comWed 2010-10-20 13:59
Thanks (http://community.livejournal.com/math_jokes/57954.html)!
Link Reply to this | Parent
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]