I've just been reminded of a thing I've been wondering for a while, which it occurs to me that my readers might be able to help me with.
There are a couple of pairs of words or phrases which are very similar in meaning, but which I vaguely remember having been told, at some point during my childhood, that there was a clear distinction between:
- ‘Recall’ and ‘recollect’: I remember somebody telling me these described specific and different ways to pull something out of your memory, but web-
searching and dictionaries now suggest to me that they are in fact simply synonyms. - ‘Polar opposites’ and ‘diametric opposites’: I remember being told that these too were distinct concepts in some specific way, but as far as I can now tell they're both just superlative forms of ‘opposite’ indicating that things are as opposite as they can possibly be.
It's mildly frustrating me that I can't remember what the distinction was supposed to be in either case. I don't much mind whether the distinctions turn out to be real or not (except insofar as their reality would have a bearing on how easy they were to look up), but I would like to know what they might have been.
So I don't suppose anyone else here might believe in a well-
(This is also reminding me, now I come to think about it, of a wordplay-
The diametric opposite of a point in a space is the point in the same space furthest away from it. The polar opposites of a space are the two points furthest away from each other. So there's nothing fundamentally special about two diametrically opposed positions: it's reasonable to talk about a space in which every point is one of a pair of diametric opposites. But polar opposites are a fundamental property of the space you're working in, and if they exist at all then they're unique.
So, if your space of possible opinions looks like a line segment, then there's only one pair of polar-opposite points of view, and everyone can agree on what they are: they're unquestionably the ones at the very ends of the line segment. Whereas if your space of possible opinions looks like a circle, then there are any number of pairs of diametrically opposite points of view, and as you suggest, which pair you consider the most important is up to you.
Hmm. Does that make sense?