Medical bureaucracy [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Mon 2007-09-17 10:50
Medical bureaucracy
LinkReply
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comMon 2007-09-17 11:07
Hm, I like "cubitary" very much but I would[1] have thought "arse" meant "buttocks" slightly more than it meant "rectum"[2], so "gluteal-cubitary dysphasia" would seem more appropriate, and I prefer the way it sounds too :)

[1] Being the sort of person who nitpicks the use of crude slang
[2] In fact, I think it means the whole area, including both. I have a similar objection to anatomical translations of words like "crotch" -- "crotch" refers to the whole area (because in casual conversation that's generally what you mean) which can be translated most accurately into more precise anatomical terms in different ways in different contexts. I don't know why people who think slang words have a more precise meaning do -- it generally doesn't seem to be supported by the usage :)
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.comMon 2007-09-17 11:10
I used very refined slang, thank you very much :p

Gluteal = buttocks [muscles]
Rectum = end of digestive system
Natal cleft = gap down the middle
I choose gluteal, because it's the biggest part, and gives the impression of maximal foolishness if you can't distinguish that from an elbow.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comMon 2007-09-17 12:25
I used very refined slang, thank you very much :p

:)

I choose gluteal, because it's the biggest part, and gives the impression of maximal foolishness if you can't distinguish that from an elbow.

That's an interesting point, actually. I totally agree with the bigness being the important thing.

But I've a feeling that it's not just because they're totally different, but because they have tangential points of similarity (as evinced by the arse/elbow picture quizes), so have a tantalizing suggestion of possibility which two completely incompatible objects wouldn't, that gives it a greater suggestion of stupidity.

But I've no idea if that was meant in the genesis of the phrase or if I just imagined it myself. If it is an aspect, it would be another argument in favour of "gluteal", which influenced me if not anyone else :)
Link Reply to this | Parent
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]