Errare humanum est [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Thu 2006-10-12 18:40
Errare humanum est

I just arrived home from work. I opened the door, picked up a letter lying on the mat, then slung my bag over my shoulder and went upstairs. I got into the study, put the letter down on the desk, put my bag on the chair, and opened the bag. Then I stopped, confused, and wondered why I'd opened the bag.

After some thought I realised that what I had in fact meant to do was to open the letter, but a mental glitch had somehow caused me to mistake which of the things I was carrying I had intended to open – and to mistake it so cleanly and at such a high conceptual level that I carefully put the bag on the chair instead of (as I do when I'm not planning to open it) the floor. At no point did I attempt to treat the bag as if it were a letter; my confusion was not at that level. I opened it exactly the way I would have done if I'd been genuinely intending to open my bag. It's just that that entire intention was the product of a glitch, and the thing I'd been intending to intend (as it were) should instead have driven me to put the bag on the floor and pick up the letter-opener. Very strange.

When I opened the letter, I found I wasn't the only person being strange. The letter was from my bank, regarding a funds transfer I had recently performed via their online banking service, and it said ‘We hereby notify you that we transferred one penny less than you asked for, because otherwise you would have completely emptied the source account and thereby automatically closed it’. This is almost fair enough (though I don't immediately see why it's conceptually unthinkable for a savings account to temporarily contain no money), except that in fact they had transferred £6000.01 less than I asked for! It turns out that the online banking interface handles transfers from this type of account by generating an email to a human, so the human must have manually copied the amount of the transfer from one place to another and got it wrong. Barking mad! I should count myself lucky they managed to get the money into the right destination account, and didn't send it all to Peru.

LinkReply
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comThu 2006-10-12 18:21
Yes, I know the feeling. It's the sort of glitch that makes me think "Wow, the brain does lots and lots of optimisation, you can tell from how it just occasionally slips."

I have walked up to wrong doors, to magic card coded doors, and if I recall correctly to cashpoints confidently waving my door key when my brain has delegated the minimum subroutine necessary to running the body and the buffer overflew at "Open ".

I don't think I've ever presented my door key to a command prompt asking for a password, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-10-12 18:33
I don't doubt it :-) But that's precisely not what I did this time. The equivalent of that failure mode would have been if I'd picked up the letter opener and attempted to apply it to my bag, or hunted confusedly for a zip fastener on the outside of the envelope; and that would probably have surprised me rather less. Instead, I opened the bag as a bag, having made a mistake at the layer above that and flawlessly implemented the wrong decision.
Link Reply to this | Parent | Thread
[identity profile] geekette8.livejournal.comThu 2006-10-12 20:25
It is really weird when things like that happen, isn't it?

And then you stand there like a 'nana for a good few seconds thinking "Why did I do that? What did I mean to do instead?"
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.comFri 2006-10-13 08:07
Unless you skipped a category level - instead of "open the X" you were working at "As soon as I get the opportunity I want to retrieve the thing from inside the X I am holding". Having picked which X to open, your brain uses the open() method associated with that object.

Are brains object oriented?
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comFri 2006-10-13 13:34
flawlessly implemented the wrong decision

LOL.

True, not exactly the same. I would say our experiences were more similar than not, in that we experienced a leaky abstraction, but yours was just as a slightly higher level. You slipped "open letter" to "open bag". I got "open cashpoint" correct but in step one slipped "get out opening device for cashpoint" to "get out opening device [default: for door]" :)
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] fluffyrichard.livejournal.comThu 2006-10-12 21:02
That glitch reminds me of the time that Louise found that I'd put the cereal in the fridge and the milk on the cereal shelf...

I've also brewed a nice pot of pure water a few times in the past, but that's mere forgetfulness and as such, far less interesting.
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] 1ngi.livejournal.comFri 2006-10-13 10:27
The best one I had was a tripple in one day that involved me trying to open the security gate at work with my debit card, get cash out of the ATM with my bus pass and present my security swipe card to my front door instead of my keys.

Link Reply to this
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]