Tempus frangit [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Thu 2006-05-25 09:28
Tempus frangit

The night before last I didn't get to sleep until 4am. Last night I dropped off fine (because I was so tired after the previous night), but when I woke up my alarm clock said 5am. I began cursing my inability to sleep for a decent length of time. So as I was awake anyway, I got up and went to the loo, and as soon as I left my darkened bedroom I noticed it was suspiciously light for 5am in May.

It turned out that my alarm clock had somehow lost a couple of hours and it was in fact 7:19, which is much more sensible. However, that alarm clock is supposed to be radio-synchronised, so I had to check quite a few other clocks before I was convinced about which one of them was wrong. That's the trouble with radio clocks: most of the time they're much more reliable and accurate than ordinary clocks, but while an ordinary clock's failure mode is to gradually drift away from the right time so that as long as you set it or checked it recently you know it must be approximately right, a radio clock is capable of completely losing the plot in the space of minutes and leaving you utterly uncertain of the right time.

Oh well; when I got to work the clocks here seemed to think I'd got it about right, so no harm done. I just hope the alarm clock was only temporarily confused.

Also when I got in to work, I opened my mailbox and discovered that I had received spam about the Da Vinci Code. Arrrrgh! I've been waiting patiently for months for the entire world to shut up about that thoroughly uninspiring book, but it hasn't happened yet. If it isn't a high-profile plagiarism lawsuit or the high-profile launch of the film adaptation, it's endless ranting about the obvious truth, obvious fictionality or otherwise of the utterly clichéd conspiracy theory, which [livejournal.com profile] cartesiandaemon pegged very accurately last week as being exactly the sort of thing Foucault's Pendulum was mercilessly mocking fifteen years before it was even published, so nobody has any excuse for taking it seriously, or indeed writing it, now. Nobody in the media seems to be able to stop talking about it, and I am absolutely sure it simply isn't interesting enough to warrant all that fascination. But now spammers are getting in on the deal as well and I've had enough. SHUT UP!

LinkReply
[identity profile] senji.livejournal.comThu 2006-05-25 11:17
My radio clock reverts to a quartz timer when the signal goes away, which means it has a ratehr similar failure mode to normal clocks.
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-05-25 11:20
I think that's fairly normal, yes; but that's only what happens in the case of a complete and clean loss of signal. If it misreceives the signal, might it not perfectly well suddenly reset itself to a crazy time?

(I found an actual spec once for the MSF signal. I don't recall it having particularly good error correction, although I suppose if it's clear and powerful enough it might not matter. I was terribly tempted to try to build a receiver for it, but I think that's just my standard instinct on seeing a clear specification for anything. :-)
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.comThu 2006-05-25 12:26
Thank you! I felt a bit guilty about adding to the amount of talk about it, but couldn't resist.

After five minutes I would probably try to find the time online (which is only half sensible as if it's generally pretty accurate from grenwich or somewhere, but you're bound to find somewhere an hour off :)).
Link Reply to this | Thread
[personal profile] simontThu 2006-05-25 12:31
I have been resisting that rant for ages precisely because it was yet more verbiage about DVC and hence in principle counterproductive, but the spam made me lose my temper...

Indeed, one of the clocks I did end up checking was my computer's, which is NTP-synchronised so it counts as finding the time online.
Link Reply to this | Parent
[identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.comThu 2006-05-25 17:12
I'm starting to think it must be something about people thinking it Speaks To The Spiritual In All Of Us or something. It certainy can't be anything to do with its literary merit.
Link Reply to this
[identity profile] benparker.livejournal.comThu 2006-05-25 23:22
I've been thinking the same thing
Also when I got in to work, I opened my mailbox and discovered that I had received spam about the Da Vinci Code. Arrrrgh! I've been waiting patiently for months for the entire world to shut up about that thoroughly uninspiring book, but it hasn't happened yet.

My problem is that the Da Vinci Code is sent up on every vaguely comedic TV show, radio show, newspaper, si it becomes quite difficult not to know something about it. And it sounds rubbish... but there's this pressure to read it as you can't relate to the world at the moment without it. The same with Big Brother.

THe trouble is, I did the same thing with Harry Potter- ignored it for ages as everyone was talking about it, and then eventually liked it when I read it. How do you know if something is really rubbish without reading it? And then you've wasted your time and money anyway!

Link Reply to this
[identity profile] kehoea.livejournal.comFri 2006-05-26 12:56
I actually used to like Amazon's recommendations in general, and then they sent me lying spam about the Da Vinci code, so I turned it off. Of course I only got a robot's answer to the below:
From: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net>
To: "Amazon.com" <store-news@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: Explore "The Da Vinci Code" Store at Amazon.com
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:25:52 +0200


 Ar an dara lá is fiche de mí Bealtaine, scríobh Amazon.com:

 > Explore "The Da Vinci Code" Store at Amazon.com
 >
 > Dear Amazon.com customer,
 >
 > As someone who has purchased literature and fiction or mysteries and
 > thrillers in the recent past,

I’ve ordered “Zen at War (Paperback)” for a friend, which is a history of
Zen Buddhism and how it related to Japanese militarism. It’s not listed as a
gift on my order page, I imagine because it’s a pre-order. Everything else
is either listed as a gift, or is non-fiction--three dictionaries and a
history of English. So, no, I haven’t purchased literature and fiction or
mysteries and thrillers in the recent past. Has someone else been using my
account, or are your recommendations broken?

Bye,

--
Aidan Kehoe, http://www.parhasard.net/
Link Reply to this
navigation
[ go | Previous Entry | Next Entry ]
[ add | to Memories ]