They have a column in (I think) the Saturday edition written by Guy Keleny which likes to point out this kind of thing...

No, I don't think that's schadenfreude at all, I think you really are laughing at a flagrant contravention of the Being Bloody Stupid Act there :)

Goodness me, I was at no point worried that I might be accused of schadenfreude! I would hope that it's obvious that I'm not laughing at the fact of suicide, or bombings, or suicide bombings. I'm just prepared to be accused of a little insensitivity in finding that the slight semantic hiccup of the sentence appearing to describe one bomber committing suicide twice jumps out at me much more readily than the tragedy of people dying...

Well, it could be schadenfreude if you were laughing at the misfortune of the author of the article I suppose.

It got a good laugh when I read it out in my office anyway :)

well, not the misfortune of the author, rather the silliness of their comments.

So you're a cynical product of a world where sensationalism rules the media - so sue you :-)

Perhaps the second attack was triggered via some kind of dead man's switch.

This, of course, is classic, and has been added to http://www.realjosh.com/ranquote.cgi

:)