(Reply) [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[personal profile] jack Mon 2014-03-10 13:14
I now actually read this proof, and it sounds right to me, though I don't guarantee I haven't missed some exception.

What confused me in the pub is, you use the axiom of choice to get a basis for R over Q. But don't you just need a basis over Q for the vector space generated by the fragment lengths you actually have, not over any possible irrationals? Isn't that just some subset of the fragment lengths, throwing away any non-linearly-independent ones?
Link Read Comments
Reply:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting