(Reply) [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[personal profile] lnr Thu 2002-10-03 00:49
The CWN article isn't quite the same as the CEN one. I think there've been more incidents since then which is why the CEN was reporting again, and it did refer to an earlier article. The paragraph in the CWN is more obviously you though :-)

I think they're sister papers, and the CWN often runs things which appeared in the CEN earlier in the week.
Link Read Comments
Reply:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting