(Reply) [entries|reading|network|archive]
simont

[ userinfo | dreamwidth userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[identity profile] gjm11.livejournal.com Mon 2008-08-18 19:34
Doesn't that just change the question from "what evidence is there for and against the existence of God?" to "what evidence is there for and against the idea that God and the universe are the same thing?"?

I mean, I could declare that my laptop and Bigfoot are the same thing, and of course I have good evidence for the existence of my laptop; but that wouldn't really make it reasonable for me to do what everyone else calls "believing in Bigfoot".

In general, I'm very very suspicious about anything that amounts to a claim to have resolved a notoriously difficult or controversial question *by definition*.
Link Read Comments
Reply:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting