Idle thought from yesterday evening
Sometimes, one band writes a song, or publishes an album, which has the same name as a different band. For example, last night
lark_ascending played me some music by ‘Van Canto’, including a song called ‘The Mission’. And Leonard Cohen had a song called ‘Sisters of Mercy’.
It occurred to me last night to wonder how common this is. In particular, my most immediate thought was this: if one were to define a directed graph on bands with an edge from one band to another iff the former had a song or album named the same as the latter, would the graph be cyclic? That is, does there exist a band called A with a song/album called B, and a band B in turn with a song or album called C, and … eventually some band X with a song or album called A? My own knowledge of music is less than encyclopedic, but I wonder if any music-
(Standard conventions for directed graphs apply: it's cheating for a band to link directly to itself, but two bands linking to one another are a valid cycle. Also, I'm prepared to be a little forgiving on the matter of whether or not band, song or album names have a leading ‘The’. Finally, I don't demand that the name matches be coincidental: if the song name directly inspired the band name or vice versa, as in the second example above, that doesn't disqualify the link.)
no subject
In general self-links are permitted in directed graphs (e.g. in automata) so I don't think this is a standard restriction.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Self-links are known to be common (eponymous albums and/or songs). Hence the base probability model on which to judge impressiveness should reflect that, by considering self-links to appear with a significantly larger probability than non-self links. So including a self-link in a cycle doesn't increase its impressiveness by very much (so I'd be inclined to consider it a cheap trick), and finding a cycle entirely composed of one self-link is definitely too easy to be a challenge. But two nontrivial cycles sharing a vertex would be a more impressive find, so I'd accept the resulting figure-8 as a worthwhile result.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject