*boggle*

[simont]

On Friday evening, the last thing I tried to do before leaving work was to write an email to my boss. I opened up a composer window in Evolution, typed in the message, attached the attachment and hit Send. Evolution put up an error box saying ‘Unable to send message’, or something comparably uninformative, and when I clicked the ‘OK’ button (which really should have been labelled ‘it's not OK, dammit, but I'm resigned to there being nothing I can do about it’) Evolution closed the composer window. No draft of the message saved anywhere I could find.

That annoyed me enough that I decided to just go home and deal with it after the weekend. So this morning I came back in, remembered about it, sighed, and prepared to rewrite the message.

Only, on a hunch, I checked with my boss first – and it turns out he did receive it. Bwarghle.

Comments

[tackline.livejournal.com]

It's more fun when you are booking a hotel and the confirmation page either doesn't appear or contains an error. You have to admire sites that tell you not to refresh pages because it might result in two bookings.

[simont]

Nice icon. Shame about the syntax colouring :-)

(Also, the "x" at the end of the fifth line from the bottom is missing its rightmost column of pixels.)

[tackline.livejournal.com]

Thanks. I was quite pleased with the exception handling.

I'm disappointed you didn't point out the bug(s).

[simont]

Hmm, yes, there does seem to be a problem which I didn't initially play it for long enough to find, namely that the ball can sometimes get stuck on the LHS of the screen and bounce back and forth within the first five columns. Perhaps replace the test x%72<5 with (d>0?1:-1)*(x-40)>35 (unless that can be improved using a standard sign or abs function), so that the ball only ever bounces if it's heading out of the arena rather than on the way back into it?

And the bat isn't displayed until it first moves; you could get round that by, for example, initialising k to -1 and conditionalising the input statement on that (k=k==-1?k:System.in.available()>0?System.in.read()-44:1). Then k will be overwritten when the time is read, and so in all subsequent iterations the input check will occur (unless System.nanoTime() happens to return exactly -1, but it'll stop doing that a nanosecond later and I think that's an acceptable response lag).

Also, I had to try three or four Java compilers before I found one which didn't either fail to cope with the preamble (insisting on main() being declared explicitly) or fail to find System.nanoTime(); and once I'd compiled the program I then had to manually configure my terminal device before it was playable (stty raw isig -echo; java G; stty sane, and better still echo -ne "\033[?25l" to disable the cursor before running it, and echo -ne "\033[?25h" to re-enable it afterwards). But I assume the former was just because I had out-of-date software, and the latter an expected consequence of Java not containing a real curses library.

[tackline.livejournal.com]

System.nanoTime is 1.5+. 1.5 has been out for around three years now. There shouldn't be a problem compiling without a main (most classes don't have a main). However, running is open to dispute. Java WebStart, for instance, does not initialise the main class as a separate step before finding and executing the main method (and it will complain if the method is defined in the wrong class loader). Terminal handling in Java is a bit limited (and available is not guaranteed to return anything other than zero), although there is Console.readPassword in 1.6.

IIRC, the getting caught in the left hand side was to do with starting position. But I forget now. I don't have many characters to spare.

[gerald_duck]

I've had Virgin's online check-in system crash for me before now, during seat allocation. It got around to deallocating my existing seat but not allocating me a new one, then said I'd already checked in when I went back to the beginning and tried again.

I was flying from Hong Kong. The website helpfully gave me a freephone number to call about it… which didn't work from China. When I arrived at the airport that evening I had an… interesting time sorting things out.

[aldabra]

When did he received it?

[shadowphiar.livejournal.com]

Gah, yes - Evolution used to do that all the time for me (most likely your quota's full and it couldn't write into the sent-mail folder). Much as I hated pointlessly switching to Windows, I do consider Outlook to be marginally less bad as an email client.

[marnanel.livejournal.com]

A program has got to some level of awfulness when people start saying "Oh well, at least Outlook isn't as bad".

[marnanel.livejournal.com]

Ooo, one of the Evo developers came on #gnome the other day asking for someone to translate a bug report from French, and I did it for him, and iirc it was a bug sounding a lot like that.

[simont]

To be fair, I am using Evolution 1.x (because the state of the Linux distribution on this machine doesn't make it easy for me to upgrade), so I'd hesitate to report this as a real bug since it's perfectly possible that 2.x has fixed it. My boss used to swear about Evolution more than anyone else in this room, but since he upgraded to 2.x he's been surprisingly quiet, so I can only assume it really is a hell of a lot better :-)

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

There's something uncanny about that time of night. The email client -- whatever it is -- needs a dialog:

Fail email in a transaction unsafe way?
[crash] [reboot]