simont |
Thu 2005-03-24 17:34 |
Given that the description in question was obtained under hypnosis and a great meal was made of how much detail Richard was able to describe perfectly accurately without consciously being able to recall it, I don't think that holds water either. You might just get away with it as an after-the-fact excuse, but I still think the descriptions were intended to be consistent and would have been if DNA (mayherestinpeace) had been paying better attention. |
|