It's not quite a Jaguar

[simont]

In other news, the car hassle now seems to be mostly sorted out. I've got a new (well, second-hand, but new to me) Polo to replace my defunct Clio; my insurance company have paid me a settlement that looked relatively plausible in terms of my own perusal of online price guides; I've given back the temporary hire car; all that's left now is for the insurers to sort out getting paid back by the other insurers, for which they don't need my help as far as I know. Phew.

Though I've been musing in the past few days that my methodology for choosing a car is wrong. (If you think it seems foolish to think about this just after I buy one, I wouldn't disagree, but better that than not thinking about it at all!) In the past my approach has been to think up a list of models that meet my basic requirements for size and price range and suchlike, then go and test-drive all of them; on some of the test drives I get a strong sense of wrongness, when it just doesn't behave the way I instinctively feel a car should, and then I go ‘warrgh!’ and decide not to buy that one.

The thing is, I got that same sense of wrongness the first time I got into the hire car, and actually it turned out I adjusted to that fine over a fortnight or so, to the point where the Polo now feels less right to me than it did in the test drive. I'm sure I'll readjust fine to the Polo, of course, but that's precisely my point: if that feeling of culture shock at an unfamiliar car is a basically transient issue, I shouldn't be basing buying decisions on it. What I want to be able to do is to distinguish the annoyances which are merely unfamiliarity from the ones that are genuinely annoying and will still be irritating me after a month, and I'm not sure if I can do that on a short test drive.

Or perhaps I should assume that any immediate annoyance is something I'll get used to eventually, and make my buying decisions solely on objectively measurable properties such as that model's statistical reliability, fuel consumption, likely TCO, and tedious things like that.

Comments

[mobbsy.livejournal.com]

My strategy for buying a car was to obsessively research things on the internet, reading many different reviews and opinions. After that, I test drove the car I'd decided on, liked it and bought it. I didn't bother test driving my second or later choices to compare.

(For gerald_duck and anybody else who cares - the car is a Mercedes C220 estate (http://www.mobbs.co.uk/merc.jpg), W203 model post-2004 refresh. One of its first jobs after I got it illustrates the requirements, which was transporting me, sonicdrift, luggage and a dog to the north of Scotland and back.)

[tigerfort.livejournal.com]

Did you realise someone had stolen your numberplate before or after taking the photo? ;-)

[mobbsy.livejournal.com]

I was worried by the gaping black hole in the front of the car, but it proved useful for distorting space-time in busy traffic.

[tigerfort.livejournal.com]

Also, you could use very small changes in its rotation to accelerate your car to almost any speed you like! (And the opposite, with regenerative breaking.) Mind you, I'm not sure whether the technology to do that is available yet, which might be a limiting factor....