simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
simont ([personal profile] simont) wrote2010-06-24 12:14 pm

Things that annoy me

Attempting a task, and then realising simultaneously that (a) it was a bad idea and would have had a bad consequence, but also (b) I mucked it up in such a way that the bad consequence did not in fact occur.

I can never work out what I should be calling myself an idiot for, in that situation!

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2010-06-24 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
In terms of learning from experience, this is certainly correct. An extreme example would watching someone trying to solve a maths expression, busily cancelling the 6s out of "16/64" and making multiple conceptual mistakes that all cancel out to give the right answer. It's probably correct to give them no answer.

Whereas in your case, it's sufficiently complicated that you can't be SURE the errors are coincidence, it's possible that "subconscious sabotage" was an exaggeration, but maybe you tried to avoid the bad consequences, and that led to messing up the implementation.

I'm inclined to count fortuitous outcomes positively :)

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2010-06-24 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
:) I'm sorry, I read that into the way you described it, but I admit it was mostly just assuming :)