simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
simont ([personal profile] simont) wrote2007-08-16 02:23 pm

Reading upside down

I've noticed a couple of times recently that about half my brain is naturally able to read upside down without thinking about it, but not the other half.

Yesterday I happened to see a blog post about image processing, which included a sample image apparently scanned from a map the wrong way up. On this image were the capital letters ‘ATH’ (presumably part of a word), upside down. Now when I see them out of the corner of my eye or while my eye scans past them to look at something else, I read ‘HIV’ (because my pattern-recogniser loses the horizontal of the T and the crossbar of the A, and reads what's left the right way up); but the odd thing is that when I look directly at those letters, I instinctively read ‘ATH’, without having to think about it, and can't see them as anything else.

The first time this happened, the blog post in question was scrolling past at high speed on my LJ friends-of-friends page; I was somewhat confused, and I braked to a halt and backpedalled the scroll bar to find out why I'd just seen the letters ‘HIV’ in a post about image processing. I stared directly at the letters ‘ATH’, saw them as ‘ATH’, and assumed I must just have hallucinated. Then the next time I worked the scrollbar, *blinks* there was ‘HIV’ again. It took me several goes before I figured out what was going on, because when I looked at the letters with the top half of my brain I absolutely could not see anything other than ‘ATH’ there.

In the kitchen at work, there's a big box sitting on the floor with ‘Squashes’ written on it. (Presumably it contains bottles of soft drink, rather than unusual vegetables, but I haven't opened it to check.) The orientation of the box is such that when I walk past it I see the word ‘Squashes’ upside down; and usually at first glance I somehow read it as ‘Squashages’. Then I look at it again and can't see why I would have thought that, because obviously it has no g in it and clearly says ‘Squashes’ – but then it happens again the next time I go to the kitchen.

It's taken me a couple of days to figure this one out, but now I think I've got it. The last few letters of ‘Squashes’, when read upside down, look quite like the first few letters of ‘sausages’. So I think what's happening is that my right-way-up reading instinct sees ‘sausa…S’ and assumes the existence of the ‘ge’ in the middle, and then my upside-down instinct starts to kick in and realises that the word starts ‘Sq’, and some overenthusiastic part of my brain's language module has combined the two to synthesise ‘Squashages’ before I manage to notice that it's being silly.

So the conclusion I draw from all this is that there are two largely independent reading subsystems in my brain. One of them can only read the right way up, apparently does so by whole-word pattern recognition, and produces answers extremely quickly; the other one can read upside down as well, has a slightly higher activation threshold (it won't fire at all if I'm not deliberately trying to read something) and takes a fraction of a second longer to give its answer, but once it's working it overrules the other one to the point where I can no longer perceive what it had been telling me.

It certainly doesn't surprise me to find that my brain supports multiple strategies for extracting meaning from the written word. Having a fast word recogniser and a slower but surer letter recogniser seems like an entirely sensible architecture, since the latter can fill in gaps and correct errors in the output of the former. But it does surprise me that they're so independent of one another that they can fight.

[identity profile] isihac.livejournal.com 2007-08-16 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm... Are you left or right handed?
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)

[identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com 2007-08-16 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Another dyslexic who never describes himself thus, because - like me - you read and write fluently?
aldabra: (Default)

[personal profile] aldabra 2007-08-16 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm deeply envious of your capacity for self-analysis at this stage in the week!

[identity profile] ceb.livejournal.com 2007-08-16 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
squashages> reasonably frequently I find my brain's read the beginning or end (or both) or a word and filled in the middle with something ... not quite right. c.f. St. Submarine's College, Cambridge, which I think is my favourite so far.

[identity profile] fluffyrichard.livejournal.com 2007-08-16 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't have quite the same problem as you, but my brain is quite capable of reading things upside down, without bothering to inform me that they're upside down. This makes markings written on the road surface for oncoming traffic which say things like "No Entry" most confusing - I've often started braking due to them before I realise that they're not intended for me.

[identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com 2007-08-16 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Squashages is the best word ever. Things that have been squashed. You have just cheered me up, anyway!

words & letters

(Anonymous) 2007-08-17 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
Word recognition & letter recognition are normally dealing with consistent data (nearly all the time we see letters in upright orientation) so these processes work nicely in tandem most of the time. Therefore those unusual occasions when they do not coincide (or more correctly, when they converge on different solutions) can be very disruptive.
The same is true of other mental processes requiring integration of information from different sources (where there is a highly regular mapping between sources in normal experience). The "McGurk effect" is one of the easiest to demonstrate:
www.media.uio.no/personer/arntm/McGurk_english.html