Linguistic synaesthesia
Today I wrote a random comment on somebody's LJ, and five minutes after I posted it I suddenly realised I'd inadvertently used the phrase ‘sounds good on paper’. Not sure how something does that. Does it rustle pleasantly, perhaps?
I suspect that mental crossover was simply due to my brain being momentarily indecisive between ‘sounds good’ and ‘looks good on paper’, and the fact that what I was thinking was an entirely abstract thought about the superficial plausibility of the comment I was responding to, to which either of the phrases I was considering would have been at best an approximation.
A more interesting case of linguistic synaesthesia showed up in a mathematical proof I jotted down in 2001 and recently found lying around on my computer, which described a nasty algebraic mess as ‘the following smelly-
no subject
No, it's perfectly reasonable for something to sound good on paper: reading is, for many people, an exercise of the auditory cortex with an internal voice pronouncing every word.
For some, it's a painful exercise of moving lips and half-suppressed mumbling speech.
Myself, I am a visual person and there is no 'sound' to a word on the page at all... Unless the passage I am reading is obviously intended to be spoken aloud, or is written in a 'spoken' style by some compelling orator. Try reading anything by Churchill (or Shakespeare, for that matter): it resounds from the page and finds the echoes in the room.
no subject
Lifestyle choices
Did you have anyone in particular in mind?
no subject